Jump to content

Talk:Drive-in theater

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Drive in memories.jpg

[edit]

Image:Drive in memories.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV Statements

[edit]

I removed the following statements for seeming POV: Nearly anyone who grew up in America during the 1950s and 1960s has fond memories of drive-ins. Whether one remembers the playground as a child, going on dates as a teenager or taking the family out, drive-ins became an ingrained part of Americana. The drive-in became an equalizer in that a person’s social or economic status was irrelevant; people simply were going to the movies.

Many drive-ins also had strange and seemingly useful devices such as mosquito nets and mosquito coils to keep the insects away but were often useless. Other devices such as rain guards seemed a bit more practical but also proved to be of little benefit.

The Second one is the only one I have any doubts about but if it should be there it should be reworded --71.131.31.58 (talk) 18:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Rather a lot of external links, I think some gardening is in order here! --tiny plastic Grey Knight 12:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the unnecessary, broken, and spammy links. I've also removed the massive amount of "in popular culture" leaving only one section that used actual prose and one list that was directly related and not just a list of "mentions". Mr.Z-man 22:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My IT Lab

[edit]

In My IT Lab this article is used as a reference in a Microsoft Word tutorial and it tells you to enter January 27, 2007 as the date of creation of the article, which is quite wrong, it's much older than that. It also tells you to enter Wikipedia contributors as a corporate author for the citation. Daniel Christensen (talk) 18:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

stereo sound broadcasts

[edit]

Later still, as in-car stereos became standard equipment, broadcast of the audio track on particular radio frequencies permitted the most efficient means of delivery. While probably true this occurred after the peak popularity of the drive-in and should be seen as part of the attempt to put off the decline. Through most of the 60s AM car radio was most common with FM being added later. Stereo radio stations were not licensed until 1961. AM was mono and the sound through the car radio would also have been mono during drive-in's golden age. Nitpyck (talk) 01:43, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While uncommon, three-channel stereo loudspeakers were available as early as 1954, largely for new drive-ins who could afford to install lines for it. The Photoplayer 07:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cool - but the article speaks of stereo broadcasts to car radios - which may have occurred but not until drive-ins were in decline. Mono broadcasts on the other hand may have happened in the 50s. Nitpyck (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By the 1970's most cars would have had at least an AM radio (but likely not AM stereo, which had a short-lived existence in the mid to late 1980's and died for want of radios to receive it). FM wouldn't have been standard until the 1980's, although certainly it (and 8-track or CB) were common options in 1970's cars. Go back into the 1960's (or, worse yet, 1950's) and car radios may well have been power-hungry vacuum tube contraptions of very limited capability, not installed in all vehicles but available as an optional-extra. Transistors existed in the laboratory in 1947 but only as a switching device proposed to replace mechanical relays in telephone exchanges. The transistor radio came later and was initially a little more than pocket-sized novelty item. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 16:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cut & print

[edit]

"Wife Beware" might well be 1932's "Two White Arms" (also released as "Wives Beware", according to IMDB)... TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 11:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture

[edit]

While many drive-ins were just screens on steel trusses, others were much more stable structures with fanciful architecture executed in a variety of materials. Many also included living space in the back of the screen. I've tried to google an example, but so far, not much luck, except perhaps for this one:

http://elpasotimes.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451c9c869e201116884d300970c-320wi

I remember as a child seeing rather plain drive-ins with two story living space in them, with a mailbox on the highway and curtains in the windows. I always thought it would be a cool place to live!

Janko (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Location of first drive-in?

[edit]

Out of curiosity, I attempted to pinpoint the location of the first drive-in theater. It is known to have been on Admiral Wilson Boulevard in Pennsauken/Camden, New Jersey (see Camden Streets, which cites the Camden Courier-Post of June 6, 1933 as saying that "On the Admiral Wilson Boulevard, near the Central Airport, [the site] occupies approximately 250,000 square feet and is comparable, in size, to Franklin Field" and that "Eight semi-circular rows, each 50 feet deep, will accommodate 500 motor cars simultaneously". Armed with this information, off I went to Historic Aerials to see if I could locate any such site on Admiral Wilson Blvd in the early-mid 20th century. I found one, in the 1940 photos, centered upon Rosemont Avenue, placing it behind what is now Zinman Furs. Camden Streets doesn't even divulge the address, and a lot of the theater site, as it seems to be, has been plastered over with suburbia. (Zinman Furs showed up in the 1950s, and suburban development on the site had begun by 1951, as Historic Aerials' photos make clear.) — Rickyrab. Yada yada yada 04:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Found some colloquial evidence to back up my analysis. — Rickyrab. Yada yada yada 04:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cars (2006 film)

[edit]

In Pixar's computer-animated Cars (film) the main characters are anthropomorphic vehicles of various types, so predictably the popular local businesses include a drive-in restaurant and (at the end of the film) a drive-in cinema.

As for decline of real-world drive-in businesses? I wonder if the trend to subcompact vehicles after the energy shortages of the 1970's is a factor. A lot of drive-in hamburger stands seemed to disappear around that era and on a larger scale (a few drive-in cinemas still stand, but good luck finding an A&W that isn't merely drive-through and posting monochrome drive-in pictures from the 1950's as nostalgia). Daytime running lights on vehicles are also an annoyance in drive-in cinemas, although that mostly affects non-US vehicles and is fairly recent (1991 and later models in Canada, for instance). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.83.61 (talk) 16:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A new drive-in was built

[edit]

Yes, that's somewhat unusual, but -- by itself -- is hardly a significant aspect of the history of drive-ins.

The first one ever built is a sizable country? That's borderline. If one is built in every major country, we certainly wouldn't want to list 200 here. But, as there are relatively few countries with drive-ins, it's probably notable.

A second drive-in is built in a country? Lacking something else to make it notable, I just don't see it. It's part of one of the largest malls in that country? Well, yeah, of course it is. No one would build it in a rural area. Also, the multiple malls that are "one of" the largest in that country all have lots of things: department stores, public bathrooms, food courts, fountains, etc. Should each of those amenities in each of the five largest malls in 200 countries be listed in each of the articles on food court, parking lot, information booth, etc.? - SummerPhDv2.0 15:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, SM Mall of Asia's drive-cinema is very notable. —&cinema;Preceding unsigned comment added by KapamilyaAdventurer (talkcontribs) 17:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I can't agree or disagree with your reasoning because you haven't offered any. I see no indication it is any more notable than the food court (that I assume the mall has).
Additionally, Wikipedia's typical workflow is outlined at the Bold, Revert, Discuss Cycle. When you boldly make a change to the article, as you did, and another editor reverts your change (as I did), it is time to discuss the issue. Restoring the change without achieving a consensus (as you have done twice) is a step toward edit warring. I'd encourage you to revert your addition until the issue is settled. - SummerPhDv2.0 03:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is a special event.— Preceding unsigned comment added by KapamilyaAdventurer (talkcontribs) 05:59, September 14, 2020 (UTC)
How does it being a "special event" make it "very notable"? Seems to me that makes it even less relevant to the overall history of drive-ins, not more. - SummerPhDv2.0 15:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-in theatre etiquette

[edit]

The drive-in theatre also have their own applicable etiquette. These etiquettes include rules such as drivers dimming lights when entering the lot and keeping car lights off throughout the film such as the break lights to decrease distraction, as well as rules for bigger vehicles moving to accommodate for other movie viewers and the prohibition of littering. https://www.warwickdrivein.com/page/11337/drive-in-etiquette

That's the etiquette requested at one drive-in theatre. This is a global encyclopaedia. To include something on the topic of etiquette we would need a broader ranging source than that. HiLo48 (talk) 01:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 85 to 95 percent box office revenue off 2021 should be explained

[edit]

As we can read on the CNN article mentioned, this was during the pandemic. The months in question are the ones where social distancing measures where in place in the US.

I tried to make the change, after "This trend was more apparent in 2020 through 2022. In 2021 Drive-in theaters in North America accounted for 85 to 95 percent of the box office revenue according to CNN" I added ", although this was largely due to the social distancing measures introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic.". Someone reverted my change, pretending I removed something. AlwaysCommit (talk) 13:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]